ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RADIO ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Types of modulation for long-distance communication on VHF. Encyclopedia of radio electronics and electrical engineering Encyclopedia of radio electronics and electrical engineering / Civil radio communications Long-distance radio communication on VHF is no longer a rarity. Now a fairly large number of radio amateurs regularly conduct communications using the Aurora, reflection from meteor trails, various kinds of repeaters, etc. Therefore, posing the question of choosing the most effective type of modulation for long-distance communication on VHF seems to be quite modern. The main factor determining the possibility of establishing a connection is the signal-to-noise ratio at the output of the receiver. Communication is possible only if this ratio is sufficient for intelligible reception of signals. The most advantageous from this point of view is the auditory reception of telegraph signals, which is already possible at ratios of 0,5-1 (from -6 to 0 dB). In addition, it allows narrowing the receiver bandwidth to 0,5-1 kHz, which somewhat improves intelligibility. Further narrowing is impractical due to the properties of human hearing: against the background of narrow-band noise, it is more difficult to parse the signal. For example, with a bandwidth of 100 Hz, the required signal-to-noise ratio already rises to 2-3 (6-10 dB). For satisfactory speech reception, the signal-to-noise ratio must be higher than when receiving telegraph signals. On fig. Figure 1 shows a graph of the intelligibility R of a speech signal (in percent and conditional points of the RS scale) versus the signal-to-noise ratio at the receiver output. It can be seen from the graph that for the intelligibility of 50% of the signals (satisfactory reception), the required ratio is three (10 dB). Therefore, if we compare the telegraph and the widely used single-sideband modulation, it turns out that with equal transmitter power, the telegraph communication range will be higher. And vice versa, with the same communication range, the required power of the SSB transmitter will be 10-40 times (10-16 dB) higher. However, SSB can be brought closer in efficiency to the telegraph if the dynamic range of speech signals is compressed, which gives a gain of up to 10 times in power.
Telegraph and SSB receivers (with mixing detectors) are distinguished from receivers designed for other types of modulation by a characteristic feature - signal-to-noise ratios coincide in their IF paths and at the outputs, since it is not actually detection that occurs here, but a linear frequency conversion operation. For all other types of modulation, there is a threshold signal-to-noise ratio, below which the signal is suppressed by noise in the detector of the receiver. This can be seen from the graphs in Fig. 2, which show dependences relating the signal-to-noise ratios at the input and output of the detector for different types of modulation. The horizontal axis represents the ratio of peak signal power to noise power about a 3 kHz bandwidth at the input.
It is assumed that for AM and narrowband FM with index m=1 (deviation ±3 kHz) the IF bandwidth of the receiver path is 6 kHz, and for wideband FM with m=5 (deviation ±15 kHz) - 30 kHz. The threshold (inflection on the graph) for AM and narrow-band FM is observed at a signal-to-noise ratio at the detector input of 5-7 dB, for wide-band FM - much earlier. Therefore, if we compare AM, narrowband and wideband FM, we can conclude that narrowband FM provides a significantly better signal-to-noise ratio at the receiver output, and hence a greater communication range. When working with such an FM above the threshold, even a slightly better ratio is achieved compared to CW and SSB. Since this type of modulation is still relatively uncommon among radio amateurs, it is worth dwelling on it in more detail. The FM transmitter is structurally simpler than the SSB transmitter, it does not require high powers of the speech signal for modulation (as with AM). Its output power is constant and equal to the peak, so it is much easier to design and set up such a transmitter (especially a transistor one). Crosstalk and impulse noise affect here much less. than with AM, since the detector does not respond to changes in signal amplitude. FM transmitters create less interference, in particular television interference. If the FM transmitter modulator provides a uniform rise in high frequencies (approximately 6 dB per octave), and vice versa, attenuates high frequencies in the receiver's bass amplifier, the gain from correction (when operating above the threshold) can reach 10 dB. Dynamic range compression is just as effective as other types of modulation - it increases the average frequency deviation and prevents overmodulation. It should be noted, however, that all of the listed advantages are manifested only when using a special frequency detector (limiter discriminator or ratio detector) in the receiver. If the detector responds to amplitude modulation, then narrowband FM is approximately equivalent to AM. Summarizing the above, we can conclude that the most "long-range" is the telegraph mode of operation with auditory reception. In second place in terms of achievable communication range is SSB, narrow-band FM is approaching this type of modulation. AM and broadband FM are the least beneficial for long-distance communications. Author: V. Polyakov (RA3AAE); Publication: N. Bolshakov, rf.atnn.ru See other articles Section Civil radio communications. Read and write useful comments on this article. Latest news of science and technology, new electronics: Artificial leather for touch emulation
15.04.2024 Petgugu Global cat litter
15.04.2024 The attractiveness of caring men
14.04.2024
Other interesting news: ▪ Production of plastic bottles from sugar ▪ Smart bracelet Microsoft Band ▪ Xiaomi Lady Bei Portable Face Skin Humidifier ▪ Cardio watch will report an attack ▪ DPP-3 - TDK-Lambda three-phase DIN rail power supplies News feed of science and technology, new electronics
Interesting materials of the Free Technical Library: ▪ section of the site Wonders of nature. Article selection ▪ article Regrouping forces. Popular expression ▪ article Who supplies CO2 to the atmosphere? Detailed answer ▪ article The main ideas of the OSMS ▪ article Dirt through the hand. Focus Secret
Leave your comment on this article: All languages of this page Home page | Library | Articles | Website map | Site Reviews www.diagram.com.ua |