Menu English Ukrainian russian Home

Free technical library for hobbyists and professionals Free technical library


BOOKS AND ARTICLES
Free library / Directory / video art

Video editing. Gluing language

video art

Directory / video art

Comments on the article Comments on the article

Just as the direct "language" of the theater director is mise-en-scene, the "language" of the director working on the screen is montage.

Of course, this statement, which arose in the 20s, at the time of the development of the montage language in silent cinema, at first glance, exaggerates the role of montage, assigning it not even a dominant, but an absolutely dominant role.

Indeed, it cannot be denied that the language of the screen is also the composition of the frame, and the sound sequence, and special means, such as combined shots, editing and filming effects, and many other directorial tools used today to create a screen thing. After all, in fact, the entire arsenal of directing means, any of the elements used on the screen may become (or may not become) an element of the director's language, through which the viewer will not only be told a story, but also awakened feelings and emotions, caused certain general and personal associations and, as a result, many-valued sensory-intellectual information is transmitted, i.e. artistic image.

In the end, this assertion of the absolute dominance of the montage language arose at a time when, out of all the wealth of today's directing tools, cinema had only shot composition, titles, and montage cuts. Plus an actor, if the picture was a play.

But on the other hand, were the classics and theorists of silent cinema so wrong? It is unlikely that the tenacity of this assertion, which even today no serious cinematographer or even television man will undertake to dispute, can be explained solely by tradition.

To understand this, let's look at the relationships of the main elements of our language.

What is a frame? Unlike a painting or a photograph, not a single film or video frame is valuable in itself. From the point of view of even pre-editing cinematography, it is only an element, a unit of montage. With the development of the montage principle, especially after the discovery of the Kuleshov effect, there is already a different practice, a different attitude to the frame. This is what resulted in Eisenstein's formulation of the frame as a hieroglyph, the meaning of which is deciphered depending on the relationship with other frames, and then with sound.

The composition and content of each individual frame on the screen has meaning and meaning only when it correlates in a certain way with the compositions and content of other frames of the montage phrase, episode and the whole thing.

"Editing is a leap into a new dimension in relation to the composition of the frame", - S. M. Eisenstein.

The same applies to all combined shots and shooting effects, incl. and speedy.

Moreover, usually a frame that is completely finished in terms of composition and semantic meaning from the point of view of painting and photography, in the montage looks like a patch, an alien body. It instantly stops the development of the editing stream, i.e. development of action and thought on the screen and interrupts the viewer's emotion. In the audience's perception, this often translates into a feeling very similar to that which occurs when the film breaks in the projector during a movie show - bewilderment and annoyance. After it, drawing the viewer back into the on-screen action is as difficult as after the title "The End of the Movie."

Another group of elements - montage special effects - already by its name speaks of their subordination to the montage principle. In fact, all the special effects known today - from the simplest mixers and curtains to the most complex three-dimensional ones - are nothing more than a connection in one way or another of two frames, i.e. variations on the theme of gluing.

And what has been said about the completed shot is also true of the overly frilly and finished special effect. Television people often sin with this, hoping in this way to save bad shots that are indistinct in emotion and meaning, or to make up for the lack of dramaturgy, "lifting up" the audience's emotion with a bright effect. But the special effect, which is stronger in impact than the frames it connects, most often destroys both the perception of these frames and its own meaning.

After all, the normal human psyche does not tolerate nonsense when the form of presentation of the text does not make it clear its meaning. In addition, one should not forget that meaningless speech or wretched verses with a pretentious or pretentious, and even costumed performance, look even more meaningless. It’s better to mumble this without intonations under your breath: they will hear less - less and scold.

And finally, sound is the most independent of the elements of film language. Disputes about its place in the screen arts continued until the 50s. and reached two extremes: from the requirements of complete synchrony to Eisenstein's call for absolute asynchrony with the image. True, already in the 30s, D. Vertov wrote about the senselessness of these disputes, saying that “Sound frames, just like in silent frames, are mounted on an equal footing, may coincide in editing, may not coincide in editing and intertwine with each other in different ways. necessary combinations.

Arguments about the dominance of sound or image on the screen are meaningless because, firstly, the sound track, like video frames, is subject to the general form of visual art. The self-valuable sound phonogram is the domain of the radio, but not of the screen. Secondly, the sound is also edited, which means that it obeys the same editing laws as the image.

So, the main way of presenting a screen work was and remains montage. This means that all other elements must be subordinated to the assembly decision of the thing, which, in turn, is a way of translating the author's intention on the screen.

Does this mean that the montage method of thinking and storytelling is unique to cinema? Yes and no.

No - because montage, as a method, has long been known and has been widely used in literature since time immemorial. After all, it was from her that the screen borrowed all the basic editing techniques. What is Griffith's parallel montage, if not the well-known literary "Meanwhile...". Not to mention more complex editing moves and techniques, even installation by size has long been known to literature. Proving this, Eisenstein liked to quote Pushkin:

"Peter comes out (gen. pl.).

His face is terrible (kr. pl.).

The movements are fast (cf. pl.).

It is beautiful (cr. or common area - depends on the accent)."

Yes - because it was in cinema that this principle became an independent language, the main means of materializing the author's intention, or, speaking scientifically, "a means of transmitting a figurative message to the recipient."

But the main thing is that montage is the main way of human vision and thinking.

Our vision does not recognize panoramas. The gaze moves from object to object or shifts focus in a sharp jump. The storyboard only reproduces this principle. And it expands it, allowing you to cast a glance without restrictions in space and time - visualizing the process of understanding what you see.

"The main psychological justification of montage as a way of depicting the material world lies precisely in the fact that it reproduces the process that takes place in our minds, in which one visual image is replaced by another as our attention is attracted by one or another detail of our environment." E. Lindgren.

Indeed, in order to understand something, we first pay attention to the general outline, then mentally separate the object (or idea) into components, and finally, having understood the particular, we assemble the object again, but not as a kind of visual image, but rather as the concept of already a personal plane, where our sensual-emotional attitude to it is imposed on the object itself.

Those. montage reproduces the well-known formula "perception - analysis - synthesis". The only difference from ordinary thinking is that the director perceives and analyzes the real object of shooting, and the viewer himself must synthesize the parts presented to him into a complete image.

But for this synthesis to be feasible, the viewer must receive a certain amount of information about the subject. Moreover, in order for the image created by the viewer to be perceived as intended by the author, including at the sensory-emotional level, this information must be carefully selected and presented in a certain sequence. Those. The main task of montage is not assembly, but the selection and combination of elements carried out according to the laws of composition to solve a certain artistic problem. It is from this that all the principles and techniques of the editing language flow, the development of which began at the beginning of the XNUMXth century, and will most likely end no earlier than screen art itself dies.

Let's try to deal with the basic, so far the simplest lexical, grammatical and other rules that exist in montage, as in any other language. These rules unequivocally work both on the big and on the small screens, their use does not depend on the form and genre at all - from a big movie to an informational plot, they are the same. Just as spelling does not depend on the genre, and its violations can only be used to convey some special features of the character when transmitting his direct speech. All other options are considered banal illiteracy both in large literature and in an article for the district newspaper. The analogy here is direct.

Author: A. Kaminsky; Publication: v-montaj.narod.ru

 We recommend interesting articles Section video art:

▪ Digital video camera as a webcam

▪ Pinnacle Systems board and TV tuners - which is better for capturing?

▪ Useful Video Editing Tips

See other articles Section video art.

Read and write useful comments on this article.

<< Back

Latest news of science and technology, new electronics:

Artificial leather for touch emulation 15.04.2024

In a modern technology world where distance is becoming increasingly commonplace, maintaining connection and a sense of closeness is important. Recent developments in artificial skin by German scientists from Saarland University represent a new era in virtual interactions. German researchers from Saarland University have developed ultra-thin films that can transmit the sensation of touch over a distance. This cutting-edge technology provides new opportunities for virtual communication, especially for those who find themselves far from their loved ones. The ultra-thin films developed by the researchers, just 50 micrometers thick, can be integrated into textiles and worn like a second skin. These films act as sensors that recognize tactile signals from mom or dad, and as actuators that transmit these movements to the baby. Parents' touch to the fabric activates sensors that react to pressure and deform the ultra-thin film. This ... >>

Petgugu Global cat litter 15.04.2024

Taking care of pets can often be a challenge, especially when it comes to keeping your home clean. A new interesting solution from the Petgugu Global startup has been presented, which will make life easier for cat owners and help them keep their home perfectly clean and tidy. Startup Petgugu Global has unveiled a unique cat toilet that can automatically flush feces, keeping your home clean and fresh. This innovative device is equipped with various smart sensors that monitor your pet's toilet activity and activate to automatically clean after use. The device connects to the sewer system and ensures efficient waste removal without the need for intervention from the owner. Additionally, the toilet has a large flushable storage capacity, making it ideal for multi-cat households. The Petgugu cat litter bowl is designed for use with water-soluble litters and offers a range of additional ... >>

The attractiveness of caring men 14.04.2024

The stereotype that women prefer "bad boys" has long been widespread. However, recent research conducted by British scientists from Monash University offers a new perspective on this issue. They looked at how women responded to men's emotional responsibility and willingness to help others. The study's findings could change our understanding of what makes men attractive to women. A study conducted by scientists from Monash University leads to new findings about men's attractiveness to women. In the experiment, women were shown photographs of men with brief stories about their behavior in various situations, including their reaction to an encounter with a homeless person. Some of the men ignored the homeless man, while others helped him, such as buying him food. A study found that men who showed empathy and kindness were more attractive to women compared to men who showed empathy and kindness. ... >>

Random news from the Archive

Tiny chip that controls multiple laser beams 17.04.2023

Engineers at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology have developed chip-scale devices to simultaneously control the color, focus, direction of movement, and polarization of multiple beams of laser light. The development is suitable for creating portable sensors and quantum devices.

Traditional optical systems, which allow even a single laser beam to be controlled, represent a large-scale structure the size of a dining table. It houses many lenses, polarizers, mirrors and other devices. To create portable sensors and quantum computers will require miniature chips.

The researchers combined two technologies at the chip level: photonic integrated circuits, using tiny transparent channels and other micro-components for light; and a source of unconventional optics known as the optical metasurface. Such surfaces are made up of glass plates with millions of tiny structures only a few hundred billionths of a meter high that manipulate the properties of light without the need for bulky optics.

The system for forming multiple laser beams (blue arrows) and controlling their polarization consists of three components: an evanescent coupler (EVC), which directs light from one device to another; meta-grid (MG), scattering light; and the metasurface (MS), a small glassy surface studded with millions of pillars that act as lenses.

In a series of experiments, the researchers demonstrated that a single photonic chip did the work of 36 optical components while simultaneously controlling the direction, focus, and polarization (the plane in which a light wave oscillates as it moves) of 12 laser beams, divided into four different colors. They also showed that a tiny chip could direct two beams of different colors to run in parallel. This is necessary to create atomic clocks.

The researchers note that they continue to work on a full-fledged optical system based on the chip. So far, laser light is not yet powerful enough to cool atoms to the ultra-low temperatures required for miniature advanced atomic clocks.

Other interesting news:

▪ New MOSFET transistor FDC6020C

▪ Electric car Polestar 2

▪ The baby's cells stay in the mother's brain

▪ Portable camera with support for SD memory cards

▪ Solar oil from greenery

News feed of science and technology, new electronics

 

Interesting materials of the Free Technical Library:

▪ website section LEDs. Article selection

▪ article Let the storm come on! Popular expression

▪ article How many people are buried on the moon? Detailed answer

▪ article Classification of personal protective equipment

▪ article Powering a fluorescent lamp with direct current. Encyclopedia of radio electronics and electrical engineering

▪ article Guessing the planned number on the dial. Focus Secret

Leave your comment on this article:

Name:


Email (optional):


A comment:





All languages ​​of this page

Home page | Library | Articles | Website map | Site Reviews

www.diagram.com.ua

www.diagram.com.ua
2000-2024