OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
General grounds for liability for damage. Occupational Safety and Health Occupational Safety and Health / Legislative basis for labor protection The Civil Code of the Russian Federation establishes general grounds for liability for causing harm. Article 1064 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation "General grounds for liability for causing harm" reads: "1. Harm caused to the person or property of a citizen, as well as harm caused to the property of a legal entity, is subject to compensation in full by the person who caused the harm. By law, the obligation to compensate for harm may be assigned to a person who is not the tortfeasor. A law or an agreement may establish the obligation of the tortfeasor to pay compensation to the victims in excess of compensation for harm. 2. The person who caused harm shall be released from compensation for harm if he proves that the harm was caused through no fault of his. The law may provide for compensation for harm even in the absence of fault of the tortfeasor. 3. Damage caused by lawful actions is subject to compensation in cases provided for by law. Compensation for harm may be refused if the harm was caused at the request or with the consent of the victim, and the actions of the tortfeasor do not violate the moral principles of society ... ". Article 1068 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is also important for the issue under consideration. "Responsibility of a legal entity or citizen for harm caused by its employee": "1. A legal entity or a citizen compensates for the harm caused by its employee in the performance of labor (service, official) duties. With regard to the rules provided for by this chapter, citizens who perform work on the basis of an employment contract (contract), as well as citizens who perform work under a civil law contract, are recognized as employees if they acted or should have acted on the instructions of the relevant legal entity or citizen. and under his control for the safe conduct of work. 2. Business partnerships and production cooperatives compensate for the damage caused by their participants (members) in the course of the latter's entrepreneurial, production or other activities of the partnership or cooperative." The requirement that "a legal entity or a citizen compensate for the harm caused by its employee in the performance of labor (official, official) duties..." is very important in the field of labor safety and means that the employer can always be recognized as the tortfeasor only on the basis of these provisions. Full refund means that the victim is compensated not only for real damage, but also for lost profits. The law establishes exceptions to the rule of full compensation for harm, i.e. cases when the amount of compensation can be changed - reduced or increased. Thus, for the attack liability for harm For general reasons, you must have:
This guilt and causation must be established, and this guilt must be proven. We all know that different activities and/or use of different mechanisms and processes have different hazards. Therefore, Article 1079 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation establishes "Responsibility for harm caused by activities that create an increased danger to others." In particular, legal entities and citizens whose activities are associated with increased danger to others (use of vehicles, mechanisms, high-voltage electrical energy, atomic energy, explosives, potent poisons, etc.; construction and other related activity, etc.), are obliged to compensate for the harm caused by a source of increased danger, unless they prove that the harm arose as a result of force majeure or the intent of the victim. The obligation to compensate for harm rests with the legal entity or citizen who owns the source of increased danger. Since various types of activities can pose a very great danger, Article 1065 "Prevention of harm" of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation provides for the following: "1. The danger of causing harm in the future may be the basis for a claim to prohibit activities that create such a danger." In life, there are cases when, when eliminating a danger that threatens the inflictor of harm himself or other persons, one involuntarily has to inflict harm on the inflictor of harm himself. According to Article 1067 "Infliction of harm in a state of emergency", "harm caused in a state of emergency, that is, to eliminate the danger that threatens the inflictor of harm himself or other persons, if this danger under the circumstances could not be eliminated by other means, must be compensated by the person who caused the harm. Taking into account the circumstances under which such damage was caused, the court may impose the obligation to compensate for it on a third person in whose interests the person who caused the damage acted, or release both this third person and the person who caused the damage from compensation for damage in whole or in part. Damage caused in a state of necessary defense is not subject to compensation, unless its limits were exceeded. Damage caused to a citizen or legal entity as a result of illegal actions (inaction) of state bodies, local governments or officials of these bodies, including as a result of the issuance of an act of a state body or local government that does not comply with the law or other legal act, is also subject to compensation . It is clearly seen that among all the possible perpetrators of causing harm, two special categories are distinguished - owners of especially dangerous objects and owners of labor. But they are almost all employers. All this leads to a situation where the employer will almost always have to compensate for the harm caused to the health of the employee as a result of non-compliance with labor protection rules. Practice has shown that a significant amount of these additional (for the employer) costs leads to systematic attempts by employers to evade compensation for harm. World and Russian practice unambiguously shows that this conflict of interests between the employer and the employee can be resolved only with the help of compulsory social insurance of occupational risks. Authors: Fainburg G.Z., Ovsyankin A.D., Potemkin V.I. We recommend interesting articles Section Occupational Safety and Health: ▪ Labor protection of employees of educational institutions See other articles Section Occupational Safety and Health. Read and write useful comments on this article. Latest news of science and technology, new electronics: Artificial leather for touch emulation
15.04.2024 Petgugu Global cat litter
15.04.2024 The attractiveness of caring men
14.04.2024
Other interesting news: ▪ Smart portable storage for potatoes and onions ▪ Tesla creates artificial intelligence processors News feed of science and technology, new electronics
Interesting materials of the Free Technical Library: ▪ section of the site Cultivated and wild plants. Article selection ▪ article by Theodor Adorno. Famous aphorisms ▪ article What is liquidity? Detailed answer ▪ article Vendor who sells food for local consumption. Standard instruction on labor protection ▪ article Nine-band KB antenna. Encyclopedia of radio electronics and electrical engineering ▪ article Specialized power supply. Encyclopedia of radio electronics and electrical engineering
Leave your comment on this article: All languages of this page Home page | Library | Articles | Website map | Site Reviews www.diagram.com.ua |